The COLLAGEN EATERS have been released! When you prep a tooth, actually, when you create injury to any bodily tissue, some stuff called matrix metalloproteinases get released. These substances consist of secreted or membrane bound zinc endopeptidases and include collagenases, gelatinases and stromelysins.

IMPORTANT: If you experienced a biochemistry flashback from that last sentence, I can assure you that the nausea will not last, just lie down until the feeling passes.

When you think you are ready, sit up slowly, take two deep breaths, come back, and complete your reading by skipping to the next bold type. Everything will be okay. Stop reading now and go lie down.

If you felt an electric shiver of excitement up your spine just thinking about the biochemical mechanisms of matrix metalloproteinase here are two articles that might serve to continue that excitement:

Effect of dentin etching and chlorhexidine application on metalloproteinase-mediated collagen degradation. Osorio R, Yamauti M, Osorio E, Ruiz-Requena ME, Pashley D, Tay F, Toledano M. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Feb;119(1):79-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00789.x.

Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. Liu Y, Tjaderhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, Pashley DH, Tay FR. J Dent Res. 2011 Aug;90(8):953-68. Epub 2011 Jan 10. Review.

The problem for dentists (welcome back) with these substances is that they destroy collagen – the stuff that you are counting on to bond your resin materials to dentin. Fortunately, there is a way to reduce the impact of these biochemical assasins, prep every tooth for a crown and cement it. Okay, we're not going to do that, so we have to try to inhibit the action of these collagen eaters, fortunately there is a way.

Many of us have been minimizing the effect of the matrix metalloprotienases for years without even knowing it. Turns out that chlorhexidine can reduce the activity of these substances, so those of us who have been cleaning the prep with a disinfectant have unknowingly helped our bonds stay bonded. The literature regarding this action of inhibition with dental materials has been done exclusively with chlorhexidine, but the medical literature is replete with examples of this inhibition using a 3% glutaraldehyde solution. Since Gluma is a 5% solution I bet it inhibits the dental collagen eaters too.

Ed McClaren was at the center recently participating on a panel for our Visiting Faculty day and I had an oppportunity to talk with him regarding this. He shared that they have found washing the prep with a 2% chlorhexidine solution first, and then using Gluma, provided a 10% increase in bond strength over chlorhexidine alone.

This information has changed my protocol for bonding anything to dentin. Remember The Checklist Manifesto article I wrote a while back? Time to change the checklist. Here's my new one.

For Total Etch

  • Etch everything
  • Rinse
  • 2% Chlorhexidine
  • Gluma
  • Bondy stuff

For Selective Etch

  • Etch enamel
  • Rinse
  • 2% Chlorhexidine
  • Gluma
  • Bondy stuff

For Self Etch

  • 2% Chlorhexidine
  • Gluma
  • Bondy stuff


Comments

Commenter's Profile Image Kevin
June 26th, 2012
Great post Gary. I have a few questions I hope you will answer. 1. How long do you need to apply CHX to the prep? 2. How long do you need to apply Gluma to the prep? I sometimes need to air dry the Gluma because, in tight prep areas, it's difficult to blot dry with a cotton pellet. I don't dessicate the tooth when drying off Gluma, but does that interfere with bond strengths or with the efficacy of the Gluma? Thanks!
Commenter's Profile Image Mark Davis
June 26th, 2012
Do you need to rinse off the 2% chlorhexidine and gluma prior to the bondy stuff?
Commenter's Profile Image Gary DeWood
June 26th, 2012
I do not rinse off either of these. I have always tried to "work" the material when I apply it by rubbing it on the dentin - for me that's probably 15 seconds or so on a tooth. I pulled up the directions from Ultradent for Consepsis (2% Chlorhexidine) and they recommend "...Dispense a small amount of Consepsis and thoroughly rub preparation. Do not rinse. The directions from Heraeus regarding Gluma are to apply only enough to treat the dentin ".... using a gentle rubbing motion with a sterile cotton pellet. Wait 30 seconds and air dry." I have to admit I don't think I'm watching that 30 second timing with my Gluma applications. I'll pay more attention to it now. Bond strengths are not adversely affected by application of these materials.
Commenter's Profile Image Gary DeWood
June 27th, 2012
I got a great e-mail from a Florida friend and prosthodontist, Ben Tindal who did research during his grad program studying MMPs. Here's his note ... Hey Gary, ..... What I am doing now, clinically, is using Consepsis for 60 seconds and Gluma for 30 seconds on post-etched dentin. I have been using All-Bond III because it is dual-cure as well. Peter Moon suggested using Consepsis for 60 seconds. What seems to prevent the MMPs the best are the quaternary ammonium compounds such as CHX and BAC which is in Tubulicid Red. Bisco has an etchant that is 32% Phosphoric Acid and BAC, which I really like as well. With Microtensile testing I found no significant difference in bond strength and actually had indications that with a larger sample size the cleansed dentin would have done better. This is definitely something that needs more research with respect to modern esthetic dentistry. .... As for Gluteraldehyde, I don't recall seeing anything (in the dental literature) about MMP inhibition. This could be very possible.....
Commenter's Profile Image Steven Roth
July 1st, 2012
If you do not rinse off the CHX doesn't that inhibit the bond- it is soap after all. This information seems to agree with Dr William Strupp's Holy TRIAD (CHX, Sodium hypochlorite, and Tubulucid Red) protocol which he has been recommending for 20 plus years.
Commenter's Profile Image Gary DeWood
July 2nd, 2012
The chlorhexidine is NOT usually rinsed off, it does NOT affect the bond, and it is very much like Strupp's protocol. Getting the bacteria was his thing - turns out it also inhibited MMPs. COOL, huh?
Commenter's Profile Image Dr. Charles LoGiudice
July 6th, 2012
Gary, Why not prep every tooth for a crown and cement it? My practice is not a high end cosmetic practice. since I took Treating the Worn Dentition and FGTP with you, I have not yet had the opportunity to do a facebow transfer and send a case out for a Cosmetic/Diagnostic waxup. I have some of these cases in the works now but they are currently in Ortho. I have not made a temporary crown since I bought my Cerec 6 years ago. The only PVS impressions I have taken since then have been for implant crowns. During Franks lectures I got the impression that his idea of the best use for Cerec is to make nice temps. Then there is your response to your question, "....ok, we're not going to do that." It bothers me that Spear Education shares space at the Scottsdale Center for Dentistry with Cerec Doctors.com and your staff doesn.t seem to appreciate Cerec and single visit crowns or that you are even aware of all that can be done with Cerec technology. It seems clear to me that if you are using Cerec I doubt that you are doing much more than scratching the surface of it's potential. I wonder if Spear Education isn't a group of older dentists who are resting on their laurels just a little bit. There is no doubt that you are great teachers but I'm not so sure that progress isn't beginning to leave you behind.
Commenter's Profile Image Gary DeWood
July 11th, 2012
Charles - The matrix metalloprotienases are present no matter WHEN you seat the restoration, prepping and seating on the same day does not eliminate the need for the clinician to deal with them at all. I was attempting to create a comparison for effect between cementation and bonding and apparently created some confusion for you. Cementation is NOT affected by the destruction of collagen fibers since resistance form, retention form, and the luting material hold the restoration in place. Of course no clinician would make EVERY restoration a crown just so that it could be cemented, that was why I made the response. Regarding CEREC, I LOVE the CEREC machine and have had many opportunities to use it in my practice in the past few years. Because my practice today is mostly the kind of cases you say you are not doing, I definitely have less opportunity to make use of it, but when it has been an option I have used it enthusiastically! At this point in my learning I am very comfortable with single visit crowns and onlays and complete them whenever the opportunity arises. I agree that I have probably only begun to scratch the surface of the potential for the technology and I continue to learn every day. As for resting on laurels and progress, I am not aware of resting very much at all in the past four years since joining The Scottsdale Center and Spear Education, and if the progress you speak of involves incorporating new techniques, new materials, and new technologies, I believe we are all left behind every day by the ongoing innovation that is increasing in velocity. I'm trying very hard to stay at least only a short step behind that progress. Thanks for thinking I'm a good teacher.
Commenter's Profile Image Will Kelly
July 11th, 2012
I couldn't read through this without thinking of my good friend/ teacher Harold Heymann. If I recall he has some pretty good things to say about gluma/ G5 and their action on MMps.. If I'm not mistaken he has dropped CHX from the protocol. In some of the comments about drying I think you have to remember that the original point of gluma was to get the collagen erect again after it is desiccated to get a velcro like bond. I had trouble following the CEREC guys logic. I practice with sound comprehensive principles and run through a CEREC or two every day. It's just dentistry... There's nothing magic about it except that you do the lab work yourself. Unfortunately most of the CE coming from CeREC and Patterson for that matter is a bunch of market and manufacture driven crap. Most of the CEREC gurus I hear are more interested in doing it fast and making a buck that doing it right and that's unfortunate consider the possibilities with the technology. (I've never had a single restoration more right than an emax I have tuned pre-fire in an equilibrated mouth). Thanks to Spear and the other institutes for encouraging regular old guys like me to strive for a higher level. Thanks to CEREC docs for making me aware of what buttons to push.
Commenter's Profile Image Gary DeWood
July 12th, 2012
Thanks for the comment Will! Great to hear from you. I had NOT heard that Harold Heymann had removed chlorhexidine from the protocol - thanks for the update. By the way - not ALL CEREC education is "crap" and "...more interested in doing it fast and making a buck that doing it right." In fact, Charles (the CEREC guy from above) is a friend, teacher, and a mentor with the CEREC docs programs here on the Spear Campus. He is ALL about doing it RIGHT! He thought on the first read that I had said we should not prepare and cement crowns immediately - my writing is not always crystal clear (sorry about that, it's just like my lectures right?). As a very enthusiastic user of the technology Charles has done beautiful large cases with it - and as he said, I have only begun to scratch the surface of the CEREC machine's potential. He wants more people to have the experience that you have had with your CEREC and is committed to helping people get there. He understands (quite rightly) that guys like me sometimes need a little nudge - OK, maybe I need a big push. Thanks for the shove Charles - and thanks for the comment Will!
Commenter's Profile Image Will Kelly
July 12th, 2012
You got it Gary. Don't quote on the CHX thing from Dr. Heymann, but I think that's correct. I should clarify about the CEREC comment that most of my experience with other CEREC doctors (study clubs, blogs, and conversation) is they are never past the wow factor of getting a crown in a day with a decent shade, match, good margins and a MI fit (with contacts all over inclines). I worry sometimes that the technology might get a bad wrap if failures start to be seen with doctors that don't slow down and use sound restorative principles with the (glass) dentistry. I also have a fear that dental implant failure rates might increase as more GPs are spitting out implants with all kind of gimmicks. I also am not real clear when my mouth gets ahead of my brain. CEREC docs is an indispensable go to for a process with endless possiblities and a sometimes illogical work flow (with no instruction manual). Funny thing on a side note... I'm fishing in Jackson hoke this week and ran right into Steve and Matt in the fly shop. Small world huh?
Commenter's Profile Image Gary DeWood
July 14th, 2012
And getting smaller faster than I'm getting older ..... and that's happening PDQ.
Commenter's Profile Image Renuka Kumar
July 30th, 2012
Can you use Peridex instead of Consepsis?
Commenter's Profile Image Gary DeWood
July 30th, 2012
Peridex is only .12% Chlorhexidine and does not produce the same effect. 2% is the recommended percentage.
Commenter's Profile Image Mike Weisbrod
August 3rd, 2012
what bonding systems is gluma and/or chlorhexidine contraindicated?
Commenter's Profile Image Gary DeWood
August 4th, 2012
None that I am aware of Mike!
Commenter's Profile Image Mike Weisbrod
August 7th, 2012
Sweet-tastic!